Howse v. Van Sickle
66 N.Y.S. 1133
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 1900
StatusPublished
This text of 66 N.Y.S. 1133 (Howse v. Van Sickle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howse v. Van Sickle, 66 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).
Opinion
Judgment of county court and of justice’s court reversed, with costs, as to the appellant, Nancy Van Sickle. Held, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment as against the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howse-v-van-sickle-nyappdiv-1900.