Howlett v. Caselle

263 A.D. 789, 31 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4934

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer of defendant Fiaschetti as not presenting a triable issue, and for summary judgment against said defendant, in an action to recover the amount of a promissory note.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howlett v. Caselle, 263 A.D. 789, 31 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

263 A.D. 789 (Howlett v. Caselle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.