Howlett v. Caselle
This text of 263 A.D. 789 (Howlett v. Caselle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event. All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer of defendant Fiaschetti as not presenting a triable issue, and for summary judgment against said defendant, in an action to recover the amount of a promissory note.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 789, 31 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howlett-v-caselle-nyappdiv-1941.