Howland v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 460
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howland v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Cust. Ct. 205 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 24, 1962·No. No. 66787; protests 61/2570, etc. (San Francisco)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise in question consist of so-called toroidal cores; have a multitude of uses; are not used solely with telephonic or communicative equipment ; and are of a type which is suitable for controlling, distributing, modifying, or producing electrical energy, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howland v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 460 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 460 (Howland v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.