Howland v. Stitzer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Howland v. Stitzer

89 S.E.2d 149, 242 N.C. 611, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 631

DecidedSeptember 21, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 149 (Howland v. Stitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howland v. Stitzer, 89 S.E.2d 149, 242 N.C. 611, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 631 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment entered in the court below is in accord with the opinion of this Court handed down at the Fall Term, 1954, referred to above. Furthermore, we find nothing in the judgment entered which is in conflict with the terms of the separation agreement involved, and which we have heretofore held to be a valid and enforceable contract between the parties thereto.

The judgment of the court below, in all respects, is

Affirmed.

WiNBOENE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment entered in the court below is in accord with the opinion of this Court handed down at the Fall Term, 1954, referred to above. Furthermore, we find nothing in the judgment entered which is in conflict with the terms of the separation agreement involved, and which we have heretofore held to be a valid and enforceable contract between the parties thereto.

The judgment of the court below, in all respects, is

Affirmed.

WiNBOENE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 149, 242 N.C. 611, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howland-v-stitzer-nc-1955.