Howland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.

822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 16, 2005
Docket2003-1538
StatusPublished

This text of 822 N.E.2d 808 (Howland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

Butler App. Nos. CA2002-09-220, CA2002-09-223 and CA2002-09-227, 2003-Ohio-3699. Reported at 104 Ohio St.3d 584, 2004-Ohio-6552, 821 N.E.2d 141. On motion to vacate judgment and for entry of a new judgment. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent. Resnick and Lanzinger, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howland v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
104 Ohio St. 3d 584 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howland-v-purdue-pharma-lp-ohio-2005.