Howland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.

822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 16, 2005·No. 2003-1538·Published

Opinion

Butler App. Nos. CA2002-09-220, CA2002-09-223 and CA2002-09-227, 2003-Ohio-3699. Reported at 104 Ohio St.3d 584, 2004-Ohio-6552, 821 N.E.2d 141. On motion to vacate judgment and for entry of a new judgment. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent. Resnick and Lanzinger, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 822 N.E.2d 808, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1436 (Ohio 2005).

822 N.E.2d 808 (Howland v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howland v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
104 Ohio St. 3d 584 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)