Howland v. Brown

17 S.E. 806, 92 Ga. 513
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 29, 1893·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

H. R. Daniel and Williams & Smith, for plaintiff in error. F. H. Saeeold and Hines, Shubrick & Felder, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howland v. Brown, 17 S.E. 806, 92 Ga. 513 (Ga. 1893).

17 S.E. 806 (Howland v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sacks v. Jordan
595 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)
Holmes v. Blount
267 S.E.2d 228 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
International Paper Co. v. Kight
238 S.E.2d 88 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Martin v. McCartney
178 S.E.2d 747 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Moore v. Georgia Power Company
176 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Huff v. Holley
113 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Davis v. Stone
77 S.E.2d 775 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Edenfield v. Lanier
58 S.E.2d 188 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Howell v. Bowden
30 S.E.2d 887 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Chambers v. Netherland
88 S.E. 545 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
McGraw v. Crosby
59 S.E. 898 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Martin v. Pattillo
55 S.E. 240 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Eubank v. State
31 S.E. 741 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)