Howland and Others Against Lenox and Maitland.
4 Johns. 311
Opinion
ON a question, as to the retaxation of the costs in this . . . , . calise, the court said, that where witnesses are brought from another state, the time of their attendance can only be computed from the place of trial, coming and returning, to the boundary line of the state; and that the distance must be taken accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howland and Others Against Lenox and Maitland., 4 Johns. 311 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
4 Johns. 311 (Howland and Others Against Lenox and Maitland.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Keck v. Seibert
32 S.W. 670 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Fish v. Farwell
33 Ill. App. 242 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)
Wheeler v. Lozee
12 How. Pr. 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Hinds v. Schenectady County Mutual Insurance
7 How. Pr. 142 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)