Howie v. Lewis

46 A. 850, 196 Pa. 558, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 555
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 11, 1900
DocketAppeal, No. 364
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 A. 850 (Howie v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howie v. Lewis, 46 A. 850, 196 Pa. 558, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 555 (Pa. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The defendant applied for rule to open judgment, which rule was granted by the court below. On the hearing of the rule testimony was submitted on the part of the defendant, to [559]*559which no answer was made by the nse party. Upon dne consideration of the testimony the rule was made absolute. As the use party, on the trial of the case- before a jury, has a full opportunity to meet the defense opposed to his claim, and declined to meet it on the hearing of the rule, he has no cause to complain. We are not prepared to say that there is no merit in the defense set up by the defendant. • - ■

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Savings and Trust Co. v. Helsel
188 A. 167 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Shaffer v. Thomas
76 Pa. Super. 368 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Howie v. Lewis
14 Pa. Super. 232 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A. 850, 196 Pa. 558, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howie-v-lewis-pa-1900.