Howey v. State
813 So. 2d 1030, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4614, 2002 WL 529975
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 2002·No. No. 3D01-2647·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant’s request for credit for time served on a fugitive warrant for a Florida offense in a foreign state. See Kronz v. State, 462 So.2d 450 (Fla.1985); Martin v. State, 796 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The order under review is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howey v. State, 813 So. 2d 1030, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4614, 2002 WL 529975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
813 So. 2d 1030 (Howey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Calafell v. State
263 So. 3d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Vieira v. Doe
813 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)