Howey v. Johnson

987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 108, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1017
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 2, 1999·No. 97-07-29021M; CA A100832·Published

Opinion

BREWER, J.,

concurring.

I concur in the result in this case because it is compelled by our decision in Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178 (1999). However, I persist in the view that Peek was incorrectly decided for one or more of the reasons stated in the dissent in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howey v. Johnson, 987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 108, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1017 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

987 P.2d 526 (Howey v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peek v. Thompson
980 P.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)