Howey v. Johnson
987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 108, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1017
This text of 987 P.2d 526 (Howey v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howey v. Johnson, 987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 108, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1017 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
concurring.
I concur in the result in this case because it is compelled by our decision in Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178 (1999). However, I persist in the view that Peek was incorrectly decided for one or more of the reasons stated in the dissent in that case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peek v. Thompson
980 P.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
987 P.2d 526, 161 Or. App. 108, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howey-v-johnson-orctapp-1999.