Howeth Bros. v. Clarke

4 Willson 112
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 12, 1890·No. No. 6235·Published

Opinion

' Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 72. Judgment dismissing a suit is a final judgment. Suit in justice’s court by appellants against appellee upon [113]*113an open account for $39.50. Appellee pleaded that he was not sued in the precinct of his residence. The judgment in the justice’s court was as follows: “Said plea is sustained and this cause dismissed from the docket. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the defendant, J. L. Clark, go hence without day, and recover all costs in this behalf incurred, for which let execution issue.” Appellants appealed to the county court, in which court, upon motion of appellee, the appeal was dismissed upon the ground that said judgment was not a final one. We are of opinion that said judgment is a final one, and that the county court erred in dismissing the appeal. It is well settled that a judgment dismissing a suit is a final judgment from which an appeal can be prosecuted. [Parker v. Spencer, 61 Tex. 155; Hagood v. Grimes, 24 Tex. 16; West v. Bagby, 12 Tex. 34; Hanks v. Thompson, 5 Tex. 6; 1 Civil Cas. Ct. App., § 467.] The judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded for a trial de novo in the county court.

April 12, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howeth Bros. v. Clarke, 4 Willson 112 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

4 Willson 112 (Howeth Bros. v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanks v. Thompson
5 Tex. 6 (Texas Supreme Court, 1849)
West v. Bagby
12 Tex. 34 (Texas Supreme Court, 1854)
Parker v.Spencer
61 Tex. 155 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)