Howes v. Halliday
This text of 10 Ind. 339 (Howes v. Halliday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by the appellants against the appellee on the indorsement of two promissory [340]*340notes. Trial by the Court, finding and judgment for defendant. Motion for new trial made' and overruled, and exceptions taken; but no written reasons for a new trial were filed in the Court below. There is, therefore, nothing before us to be determined. Madison, &c., Railroad Co. v. Franklin Township, 8 Ind. R. 528.—Lagro, &c., Plankroad Co. v. Eriston, at the present term of this Court
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Post, 342.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ind. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howes-v-halliday-ind-1858.