Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus.

Nevada Supreme Court

Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus.

DecidedMay 11, 2021

Docket82092

StatusPublished

This text of Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus. (Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus., (Neb. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JEFFREY HOWERTON, No. 82092 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; NEVADA FILE ATTORNEY GENERAL; NEVADA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY; MAY 1 1 2021 HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; EUZABET A. BROWN CLE F PREME AND LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN BY CLERK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Res e ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge. On March 31, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant, within 14 days, to file the transcript request form, the docketing statement, and an opening brief or informal brief for pro se parties. The order cautioned appellant that failure to comply timely could result in the dismissal of this appeal. NRAP 9(a)(7); NRAP 14(c); NRAP 31(d). To date appellant has not filed the documents or otherwise communicated with this

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

OM 1947A .4124a, 2-1 - court; accordingly, it appears appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Cadish

J. CT •

Pickering (4. Hermon

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Jeffrey Howerton Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

(3) I 947A 2 '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JEFFREY HOWERTON, No. 82092 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; NEVADA FILE ATTORNEY GENERAL; NEVADA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY; MAY 1 1 2021 HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; EUZABET A. BROWN CLE F PREME AND LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN BY CLERK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Res e ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge. On March 31, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant, within 14 days, to file the transcript request form, the docketing statement, and an opening brief or informal brief for pro se parties. The order cautioned appellant that failure to comply timely could result in the dismissal of this appeal. NRAP 9(a)(7); NRAP 14(c); NRAP 31(d). To date appellant has not filed the documents or otherwise communicated with this

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

OM 1947A .4124a, 2-1 - court; accordingly, it appears appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Cadish

J. CT •

Pickering (4. Hermon

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Jeffrey Howerton Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

(3) I 947A 2 '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howerton-vs-state-dept-of-bus-and-indus-nev-2021.