Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JEFFREY HOWERTON, No. 82092 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; NEVADA FILE ATTORNEY GENERAL; NEVADA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY; MAY 1 1 2021 HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; EUZABET A. BROWN CLE F PREME
AND LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN BY CLERK
POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Res e ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge.
On March 31, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant, within 14 days, to file the transcript request form, the docketing statement, and an opening brief or informal brief for pro se parties. The order cautioned appellant that failure to comply timely could result in the dismissal of this appeal. NRAP 9(a)(7); NRAP 14(c); NRAP 31(d). To date appellant has not filed the documents or otherwise communicated with this
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
OM 1947A .4124a, 2-1 -
court; accordingly, it appears appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J.
Cadish
J. CT •
Pickering
(4. Hermon
cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Jeffrey Howerton Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(3) I 947A
2
'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus. (Howerton Vs. State, Dep'T Of Bus. And Indus.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.