Howell v. Wright Dairy Co.

31 Misc. 755
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 755 (Howell v. Wright Dairy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. Wright Dairy Co., 31 Misc. 755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Guriam.

The record does not show, that the defendant is a domestic corporation, having its principal place of business within the city of Hew York, nor is there any evidence whatsoever tending to show jurisdiction over the defendant. This is fatal to the judgment. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151. The objection was taken for the first time on this appeal. While this may be done, the court, in reversing the judgment and ordering a new [756]*756trial, will do so under these circumstances, without awarding costs. Willis v. Parker, 30 Misc. Rep. 750.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyroler v. Gummersbach
28 Misc. 151 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Willis v. Parker
30 Misc. 750 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Misc. 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-wright-dairy-co-nyappterm-1900.