Howell v. Wilson

Fourth Circuit

Howell v. Wilson

653 F. App'x 216

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2016·No. No. 16-6111·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick L. Howell appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howell v. Wilson, No. 4:15-cv-02561-JFA, 2015 WL 7272185 (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick L. Howell appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howell v. Wilson, No. 4:15-cv-02561-JFA, 2015 WL 7272185 (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Howell v. Wilson, 653 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

653 F. App'x 216 (Howell v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related