Howell v. Thompson
This text of 839 S.W.2d 92 (Howell v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The court of appeals’ issuance of its opinion and judgment was void because it occurred after petitioner filed bankruptcy proceedings and during the pendency of the automatic stay provided by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp., 751 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Tex.1988). It is therefore ordered that petitioner’s application for writ of error is granted, the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. Tex.R.App.P. 170. This order does not preclude reis-suance of the same opinion and judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
839 S.W.2d 92, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 100, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 134, 1992 WL 296966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-thompson-tex-1992.