Howell v. Telusme

Florida Circuit Courts

Howell v. Telusme

43 Fla. Supp. 2d 137

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 1990

DocketCase No. 88-157-AC

StatusPublished

This text of 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 137 (Howell v. Telusme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howell v. Telusme, 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 137 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The driver’s license of the Appellee had been revoked by the [138]*138Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. When Appellee’s violation of driving with a suspended license was dismissed, the Court then ordered Ms. Howell, a state supervisor, under penalty of contempt, to issue the license forthwith.

The State failed to take a timely appeal. This Court is only concerned with the contempt proceeding against Ms. Howell.

It is well settled that a court does not have contempt powers to enforce a violation of its order if it is rendered without jurisdiction over the subject matter or the parties. In re Elrod, 455 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Kaylor v Kaylor; 466 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Friedman v Friedman, 224 So.2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). Ms. Howell was not a party in the original criminal proceeding. The trial court never obtained jurisdiction over Ms. Howell either personally or as an employee of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

The County Court judge further had no subject matter jurisdiction. He was without authority to order the issuance of a driver’s license. Pursuant to Section 322.31 Florida Statutes (1987), final orders and rulings of the department where any person is denied a license are only reviewable by Writ of Certiorari issued by the Circuit Court in the county wherein the person resides. The appellee sought the wrong remedy by filing a motion of contempt. State Department of Highway Safety v Voght, 489 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Mellon v Cannon, 482 SO.2d 604 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

The trial court exceeded its jurisdiction.

The order of contempt is hereby vacated and set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The driver’s license of the Appellee had been revoked by the [138]*138Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. When Appellee’s violation of driving with a suspended license was dismissed, the Court then ordered Ms. Howell, a state supervisor, under penalty of contempt, to issue the license forthwith.

The State failed to take a timely appeal. This Court is only concerned with the contempt proceeding against Ms. Howell.

It is well settled that a court does not have contempt powers to enforce a violation of its order if it is rendered without jurisdiction over the subject matter or the parties. In re Elrod, 455 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Kaylor v Kaylor; 466 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Friedman v Friedman, 224 So.2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). Ms. Howell was not a party in the original criminal proceeding. The trial court never obtained jurisdiction over Ms. Howell either personally or as an employee of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

The County Court judge further had no subject matter jurisdiction. He was without authority to order the issuance of a driver’s license. Pursuant to Section 322.31 Florida Statutes (1987), final orders and rulings of the department where any person is denied a license are only reviewable by Writ of Certiorari issued by the Circuit Court in the county wherein the person resides. The appellee sought the wrong remedy by filing a motion of contempt. State Department of Highway Safety v Voght, 489 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Mellon v Cannon, 482 SO.2d 604 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

The trial court exceeded its jurisdiction.

The order of contempt is hereby vacated and set aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 Fla. Supp. 2d 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-telusme-flacirct-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack