Howell v. State

255 S.W. 171, 95 Tex. Crim. 583, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 707
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 6, 1923·No. No. 7779.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Ellis County of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts.. The trial term of0the court below adjourned December 2, 1922, an order having been entered granting appellant sixty days in which to file bills of exception and statement of facts. The bills of exception were filed on March 3, .1923. There was no order extending the time. The bills of exception were filed too late to be considered by us.

The indictment appearing to sufficiently charge the offense, and there being no error apparent in the record, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell v. State, 255 S.W. 171, 95 Tex. Crim. 583, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 707 (Tex. 1923).

255 S.W. 171 (Howell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
234 A.2d 900 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1967)
Short v. State
167 S.W.2d 200 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1942)