Howell v. State

148 S.W. 302, 67 Tex. Crim. 363, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 438
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 1912
DocketNo. 1708.
StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.W. 302 (Howell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. State, 148 S.W. 302, 67 Tex. Crim. 363, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 438 (Tex. 1912).

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss this appeal because the recognizance is fatally defective in that it does not state the amount of the punishment assessed against appellant. An inspection of that instrument sustains the contention of the State. It is well taken, therefore the appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burton v. State
90 S.W. 498 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.W. 302, 67 Tex. Crim. 363, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.