Howell v. Shotwell

55 N.J. Eq. 824
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedNovember 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 55 N.J. Eq. 824 (Howell v. Shotwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. Shotwell, 55 N.J. Eq. 824 (N.J. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Depue, Garrison, Gummebe, Lippincott, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogebt, Hendbickson, Nixon — 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.J. Eq. 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-shotwell-njch-1896.