Howell v. Moon

116 So. 518, 217 Ala. 421, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 511
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 12, 1928·No. 7 Div. 774.·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

ANDERSON, O. J.

There are three assignments of error, but the first two are merely repeated in brief for appellant, and this does not amount to such an insistence or argument as to require the consideration of same. Western Union Co. v. Benson, 159 Ala. 273, 48 So. 712; 5 Mayfield Digest, p. 32, § 32.

The third assignment of error relates to the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and the evidence was ore terms and the conclusion reached was like unto the verdict of a jury, and will not be disturbed by this court, unless plainly contrary to the great weight of the evidence. The evidence was in sharp conflict as to where the line was between the parties and as to whether the defendant’s possession extended beyond the line. Moreover, it was agreed that the trial judge make an inspection of the premises which was done.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BROWN JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell v. Moon, 116 So. 518, 217 Ala. 421, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 511 (Ala. 1928).

116 So. 518 (Howell v. Moon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central of Georgia Railway Company v. Burton
170 So. 2d 812 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Ledbetter-Johnson Company v. Hawkins
103 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Stewart v. Weaver
87 So. 2d 548 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Jordan v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.
48 So. 2d 58 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1950)
Bain v. Walker
166 So. 772 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
Perkins Oil Co. v. Davis
157 So. 417 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Kimbrell
145 So. 433 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Futvoye v. Chuites
140 So. 432 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Schowalter v. Schowalter
128 So. 458 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Barfield v. Bartlett
119 So. 696 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)
Berman v. Lander Realty Co.
116 So. 745 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)