Howell v. Jackson

155 S.E. 26, 171 Ga. 245, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 325

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 27, 1930·No. No. 7551·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

On the facts shown by the pleadings in this case, the trial judge abused his discretion in referring the case to an auditor. Civil Code, § 5127.

The error in referring the case to an auditor rendered all further proceedings nugatory. See Bush v. Murphey, 113 Ga. 345 (38 S. E. 828).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices eoneur. Orin J. Bundy, J. L. B. Boyd, for plaintiff. B. B. Jackson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

On the facts shown by the pleadings in this case, the trial judge abused his discretion in referring the case to an auditor. Civil Code, § 5127.

The error in referring the case to an auditor rendered all further proceedings nugatory. See Bush v. Murphey, 113 Ga. 345 (38 S. E. 828).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices eoneur. Orin J. Bundy, J. L. B. Boyd, for plaintiff. B. B. Jackson, for defendant.

Howell v. Jackson, 155 S.E. 26, 171 Ga. 245, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 325 (Ga. 1930).

Pincite

155 S.E. 26 (Howell v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.