Howell v. Howell

700 So. 2d 467, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11996, 1997 WL 659830
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1997·No. No. 97-3165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order finding him to be in civil contempt and committing him to jail for his failure to pay past due child support. We conclude that the trial court’s order is facially deficient in that it does not contain a finding that petitioner has the present ability to pay the purge amount. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Coogan v. Coogan, 662 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Moreover, we conclude that the record before this court would not support such a finding, had one been made. Accordingly, the petition for [468] writ of certiorari is granted and the trial court’s order of contempt is quashed.

JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell v. Howell, 700 So. 2d 467, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11996, 1997 WL 659830 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

700 So. 2d 467 (Howell v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walden v. Adekola
773 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)