Howell v. Howell

151 So. 379, 113 Fla. 129, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1692
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 5, 1933·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order, herein, and briefs' and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is', therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.

Brown, J., dissents.

Terrell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell v. Howell, 151 So. 379, 113 Fla. 129, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1692 (Fla. 1933).

151 So. 379 (Howell v. Howell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kiplinger v. Kiplinger
2 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Valverde v. Valverde
164 So. 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)