Howell v. First National Bank

52 Kan. 133
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided July 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

Plaintiffs in error were joined with many others as defendants in an action brought by the defendant in error, to enforce their statutory liability as stockholders in an insolvent corporation. They demurred to the petition, on the ground that several causes of action were improperly joined. The demurrer was overruled, and, the defendants electing to [134]*134stand thereon, judgment was entered against each of them for ditferent amounts.

The identical question presented in this case was fully considered by this court in the case of Abbey v. Dry Goods Co., 44 Kas. 415. With the decision in that case we are entirely satisfied.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell v. First National Bank, 52 Kan. 133 (kan 1893).

52 Kan. 133 (Howell v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waller v. Hamer
69 P. 185 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1902)
Pulsifer v. Greene
52 A. 921 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1902)
Blair v. Newbegin
65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 425 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1902)
Hancock National Bank v. Ellis
42 L.R.A. 396 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Hancock National Bank v. Farnum
40 A. 341 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1898)
New York Life Ins. v. Beard
80 F. 66 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas, 1897)
Cushing v. Perot
34 A. 447 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
McVickar v. Jones
70 F. 754 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire, 1895)