Howell v. . Ferguson

87 N.C. 113
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 87 N.C. 113 (Howell v. . Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. . Ferguson, 87 N.C. 113 (N.C. 1882).

Opinion

*115 Ashe, J.,

after stating the above. Sham and irrelevant answers .and defences may be stricken out -on motion, and upon such terms as the court may in its discretion impose. O. O. P., '§ 104. A sham answer is one that is false in fact.; an irrelevant answer is one which has no substantial relation to the controversy between the parties to the action; •and an answer is frivolous when, assuming its contents to ■be true, it presents no defence to the action. Bliss on Code Pleading, 507, and note.

It would seem from .the definitions, that the distinction between -an irrelevant and frivolous answer is virtually without a difference, and that they maj be considered as •correlative terms.

Assuming then all the allegations of the defendants’ answer to be true, .there is not one of them that constitutes a •substantial defence to the action, and the answer is therefore frivolous, and should have been stricken out and judgment given as fox the want of -an answer.

But we might very well have put our decision on this appeal upon another ground, which is, that there is no error assigned by the defendants and as none appears on the record, the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. Swepson v. Summey, 74 N. C., 551.

No error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State Highway Commission
150 S.E.2d 70 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Norris v. Johnson
97 S.E.2d 773 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Council v. Dickerson's, Inc.
64 S.E.2d 551 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Weil Bro. v. . Uzzell
92 N.C. 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 N.C. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-ferguson-nc-1882.