Howell v. Edwards
99 A. 1070, 89 N.J.L. 713, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 382
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Teenchard, Bergen, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER,. JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howell v. Edwards, 99 A. 1070, 89 N.J.L. 713, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 382 (N.J. 1916).
99 A. 1070 (Howell v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Lichtenstein
247 A.2d 320 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)