Howell v. Edwards
99 A. 1070, 89 N.J.L. 713, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 382
This text of 99 A. 1070 (Howell v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howell v. Edwards, 99 A. 1070, 89 N.J.L. 713, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 382 (N.J. 1916).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Teenchard, Bergen, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER,. JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Estate of Lichtenstein
247 A.2d 320 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 A. 1070, 89 N.J.L. 713, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-edwards-nj-1916.