Howell v. Denniston
3 Cai. Cas. 96, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 448
This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 96 (Howell v. Denniston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howell v. Denniston, 3 Cai. Cas. 96, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 448 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
The rule to plead was irregularly entered ; because, until the writ be returned, bail filed, or an appearance en= tered, there is no basis for a proceeding, and the court has no cognizance of the cause, so as to authorize pleadings. With respect to their being no merits, we never regard that, when the application is for irregularity.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 96, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-denniston-nysupct-1805.