Howell v. Delaware

311 F. App'x 675
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2009
Docket08-1909
StatusUnpublished

This text of 311 F. App'x 675 (Howell v. Delaware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. Delaware, 311 F. App'x 675 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*676 PER CURIAM:

Burl Anderson Howell seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his action to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for further proceedings. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Howell seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See In re Carefirst of Md., Inc., 305 F.3d 253, 257 (4th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to consolidate, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)
In Re Carefirst Of Maryland, Incorporated
305 F.3d 253 (First Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 F. App'x 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-delaware-ca4-2009.