Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Howell v. City of Thomaston

Howell v. City of Thomaston

94 S.E. 81, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 470
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1917
Docket9062
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 81 (Howell v. City of Thomaston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. City of Thomaston, 94 S.E. 81, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

Under the rulings in Toliver v. Wrightsville, 17 Ga. App. .345 (86 S. E. 823), Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720), and Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), the petition' for certiorari did not affirmatively show that the petitioner had given such a bond as is required by the statute, and the court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toliver v. Mayor of Wrightsville
86 S.E. 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Hubert v. City of Thomasville
90 S.E. 720 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Gillespie v. Mayor of Macon
90 S.E. 970 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 81, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-city-of-thomaston-gactapp-1917.