Howell v. City of Thomaston

94 S.E. 81, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 470
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 31, 1917·No. 9062·Published

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

Under the rulings in Toliver v. Wrightsville, 17 Ga. App. .345 (86 S. E. 823), Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720), and Gillespie v. Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), the petition' for certiorari did not affirmatively show that the petitioner had given such a bond as is required by the statute, and the court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell v. City of Thomaston, 94 S.E. 81, 21 Ga. App. 129, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 81 (Howell v. City of Thomaston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toliver v. Mayor of Wrightsville
86 S.E. 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Hubert v. City of Thomasville
90 S.E. 720 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Gillespie v. Mayor of Macon
90 S.E. 970 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)