Howell v. Capelli

9 A.D. 18, 41 N.Y.S. 105
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 A.D. 18 (Howell v. Capelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell v. Capelli, 9 A.D. 18, 41 N.Y.S. 105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Landon, J.:

The plaintiff having failed to appear upon the adjourned day, either in person- or by attorney or agent, we think the statute required the justice to render a judgment of nonsuit with costs against him. (Code Civ; Proc. §§ 2861, 3013.) We do not think, in view of the statement made by the person representing the defendant, that he consented to the adjournment.

Judgment, reversed, with costs.

All concurred.

Judgment of County Court and of Justice’s reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kellan v. McLean
120 Misc. 284 (New York County Courts, 1923)
Leonard v. Rima
82 Misc. 358 (New York County Courts, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D. 18, 41 N.Y.S. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-v-capelli-nyappdiv-1896.