Howell v. Booyer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7195

DAVID HOWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OFFICER C. L. BOOYER; CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03043-FL)

Submitted: March 17, 2011 Decided: April 1, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURGE & BOUGHMAN, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Howell appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Howell v. Booyer, No. 5:09-ct-03043-FL (E.D.N.C.

Aug. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED