Howell v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Howell v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

377 A.2d 1124, 173 Conn. 776

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 28, 1977·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File Typewritten Briefs and Appendices and for Order that Plaintiff Shall Not Have to Bear the Expense of . . . [Subsequent] Printing” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted [777] to the extent that permission is given for the filing of typewritten briefs and appendices provided they are clearly legible and comply with the other requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book.

Allan Rubenstein, in support of the motion. Submitted September 12 decided September 28, 1977

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s “Motion for Permission to File Typewritten Briefs and Appendices and for Order that Plaintiff Shall Not Have to Bear the Expense of . . . [Subsequent] Printing” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted [777] to the extent that permission is given for the filing of typewritten briefs and appendices provided they are clearly legible and comply with the other requirements of §§ 723 and 724 of the Practice Book.

Allan Rubenstein, in support of the motion. Submitted September 12 decided September 28, 1977

Howell v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, 377 A.2d 1124, 173 Conn. 776 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

377 A.2d 1124 (Howell v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.