Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam

Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam

242 A.D. 893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D. 893 (Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam, 242 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff moved for an order striking out a separate defense in the answer, and also for summary judgment. Order denying motion is affirmed. The record does not disclose upon what theory the former action was disposed of. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-macarthur-wiggin-inc-v-putnam-nyappdiv-1934.