Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam
242 A.D. 893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Plaintiff moved for an order striking out a separate defense in the answer, and also for summary judgment. Order denying motion is affirmed. The record does not disclose upon what theory the former action was disposed of. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam, 242 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 893 (Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. Putnam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.