Howell (David) Vs. Warden

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 13, 2021
Docket83015
StatusPublished

This text of Howell (David) Vs. Warden (Howell (David) Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howell (David) Vs. Warden, (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAVID HOWELL, No. 83015 Appellant, vs. RENEE BAKER, WARDEN, FILE R.espondent. JUL 1 3 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLER192 Ft JPREME COURT BY ' DEPUTY CLERIC

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eleventh Judicial District Court, Pershing County; Jim C. Shirley, Judge. Notice of entry of the order dismissing appellant's petition was served on appellant on April 2, 2021. The notice of appeal was therefore due to be filed by May 6, 2021. See NRS 34.575; NRCP 6; NRAP 26(a), (c). Appellant's notice of appeal, however, was not filed in the district court until May 26, 2021, well past the expiration of the relevant appeal period. Because appellant signed his notice of appeal on May 6, 2021, within the prescribed appeal period, this court entered an order directing the attorney general to provide this court with a copy of the notice of appeal log or other system designed for legal mail maintained by the prison indicating the actual date upon which appellant delivered his notice of appeal to a prison official. See NRAP 4(d) (providing that a notice of appeal filed by an inmate confined in an institution is timely "if it is delivered to a prison official for mailing on or before the last day for filing" and that to receive the benefit of this rule, an inrnate must use the notice-of-appeal log or other system designed for legal mail, if such a log or system is utilized by the institution). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

40) I94TA ears Review of the attorney general's response and the declaration of the prison law librarian who maintains the notice of appeal log indicates that appellant did not use the notice-of-appeal log at his institution. Because there appears to be no record that appellant timely delivered his notice of appeal to a prison official, the May 26, 2021, date controls. Appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, and this court lacks jurisdiction. See Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994) ([A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). This court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

tfc4k. J. Pari guirre

Stiglich

Lit:4"/Lp J. Silver

cc: Hon. Jirn C. Shirley, District Judge David Howell Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947.1 4141P. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Howell (David) Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howell-david-vs-warden-nev-2021.