Howell 240303 v. Mayhew

District Court, W.D. Michigan·Decided May 31, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-00069·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN HOWELL,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:21-cv-69 v. HON. JANET T. NEFF UNKNOWN MAYHEW, et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________/

ORDER

This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff has failed to properly exhaust his administrative remedies. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on April 27, 2022, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment in favor of Defendants. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s remaining claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any objections. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007). A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Dated: May 31, 2022 /s/ Janet T. Neff JANET T. NEFF United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell 240303 v. Mayhew, (W.D. Mich. 2022).

Howell 240303 v. Mayhew (Howell 240303 v. Mayhew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related