Howe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Howe v. State

1913 OK CR 211, 132 P. 1193, 9 Okla. Crim. 728, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 7, 1913

DocketNo. A-1610.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 211 (Howe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howe v. State, 1913 OK CR 211, 132 P. 1193, 9 Okla. Crim. 728, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed the following motion to dismiss the appeal;

“Comes now the State of Oklahoma by the Attorney General and, appearing specially for the purpose of this motion, moves the court to dismiss the appeal herein, and as grounds therefor shows: That plaintiff in error was prosecuted for the offense of assault with intent to kill; that he was convicted of aggravated assault, and the punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days. That the judgment was rendered on August 9, 1911; that on February 6, 1912, a case-made was filed in this court, but no petition in error was filed at said time or at any other time.”

No answer to said motion has been filed. When the case was called for trial on this day on the regular assignment no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The motion to dismiss the appeal is therefore allowed and the cause remanded to the *729 district court of Beaver county -with direction to enforce its judgment therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Attorney General has filed the following motion to dismiss the appeal;

“Comes now the State of Oklahoma by the Attorney General and, appearing specially for the purpose of this motion, moves the court to dismiss the appeal herein, and as grounds therefor shows: That plaintiff in error was prosecuted for the offense of assault with intent to kill; that he was convicted of aggravated assault, and the punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days. That the judgment was rendered on August 9, 1911; that on February 6, 1912, a case-made was filed in this court, but no petition in error was filed at said time or at any other time.”

No answer to said motion has been filed. When the case was called for trial on this day on the regular assignment no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The motion to dismiss the appeal is therefore allowed and the cause remanded to the *729 district court of Beaver county -with direction to enforce its judgment therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 211, 132 P. 1193, 9 Okla. Crim. 728, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.