Howe v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

91 N.Y.S. 1098

This text of 91 N.Y.S. 1098 (Howe v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howe v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 91 N.Y.S. 1098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, upon questions of law only; the facts having been examined and no error found therein. Held, that it was error to exclude the evidence offered by the defendant as to the conditions and nature of the soil on either side of the plaintiff’s lands.

SPRING, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 N.Y.S. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1905.