Howe v. MacDonald

3 So. 2d 724, 147 Fla. 745, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1361
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 3 So. 2d 724 (Howe v. MacDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howe v. MacDonald, 3 So. 2d 724, 147 Fla. 745, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1361 (Fla. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is our second consideration of this case. Howe v. MacDonald, et al., 141 Fla. 822, 194 So. 802. It is a companion case to Howe v. Samuel Sands, et al., decided this date, there being no difference in the factual background of the two cases except in this case the bill of complaint was filed by appellees praying that they be declared to be “servants” of James Deering, entitled to inherit under his will.

In all other respects, the facts and the questions raised are identical. The judgment appealed from is accordingly reversed on authority of the latter case.

Reversed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell and Chapman, J. J., concur. Buford and Thomas, J. J., dissent. Adams, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howe v. MacDonald
194 So. 802 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 So. 2d 724, 147 Fla. 745, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-macdonald-fla-1941.