Howe v. Jeremiah

62 A.D.3d 751, 878 N.Y.S.2d 894
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 12, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 A.D.3d 751 (Howe v. Jeremiah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howe v. Jeremiah, 62 A.D.3d 751, 878 N.Y.S.2d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine the rights of the parties to certain real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schack, J.), dated August 10, 2007, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his counterclaims and directed him to file a note of issue for an inquest, and the defendant cross appeals from stated portions of the same order.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the defendant is not aggrieved by the portion of the order cross-appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his counterclaims is deemed withdrawn.

The Supreme Court erroneously granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his counterclaims, as he specifically withdrew his motion for summary judgment prior to the court’s determination thereof. Therefore, the order must be reversed insofar as appealed from.

[752]*752The defendant’s cross appeal, which relates to his motion to strike the plaintiff’s reply to his counterclaims, must be dismissed, as that motion remains pending and undecided (see Andreas v Catskill Mtn. Lodging, LLC, 60 AD3d 604 [2009]; Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536, 542-543 [1979]). Spolzino, J.P., Dillon, Florio and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Nunez
2026 NY Slip Op 00935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Elianor
2020 NY Slip Op 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Weinstock v. Sanders
2016 NY Slip Op 7947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.D.3d 751, 878 N.Y.S.2d 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-jeremiah-nyappdiv-2009.