Howe v. Howe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Howe v. Howe

354 So. 2d 1242, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15231

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 7, 1978

DocketNo. GG-42

StatusPublished

This text of 354 So. 2d 1242 (Howe v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howe v. Howe, 354 So. 2d 1242, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15231 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although the order for sale entered April 4,1977, appears not to have been predicated on an adjudication of the interests of the estate in the property that was subject to the order, the record contains indications of consent by the parties to the court’s exercise of jurisdiction over the property for certain purposes, even absent such an adjudication. The record otherwise provides an unsatisfactory basis for determination of [1243]*1243any error in the order from which the appeal was taken. Without prejudice to proceedings for a decisive determination of the estate’s interest in the property, or for reconsideration of the appealed order in the light of subsequent events, the order is

AFFIRMED. See Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.100; Baker v. Baker, 327 So.2d 205 (Fla.1976).

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Although the order for sale entered April 4,1977, appears not to have been predicated on an adjudication of the interests of the estate in the property that was subject to the order, the record contains indications of consent by the parties to the court’s exercise of jurisdiction over the property for certain purposes, even absent such an adjudication. The record otherwise provides an unsatisfactory basis for determination of [1243]*1243any error in the order from which the appeal was taken. Without prejudice to proceedings for a decisive determination of the estate’s interest in the property, or for reconsideration of the appealed order in the light of subsequent events, the order is

AFFIRMED. See Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.100; Baker v. Baker, 327 So.2d 205 (Fla.1976).

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 So. 2d 1242, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-howe-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack