Howe v. Helmick

Washington Supreme Court

Howe v. Helmick

335 P.2d 598, 53 Wash. 2d 829, 1959 Wash. LEXIS 350

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 19, 1959

DocketNo. 34769

StatusPublished

This text of 335 P.2d 598 (Howe v. Helmick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howe v. Helmick, 335 P.2d 598, 53 Wash. 2d 829, 1959 Wash. LEXIS 350 (Wash. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action for attorney fees. The defendants called for a jury. They have appealed from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict.

Their single assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. No exceptions were taken to the instructions. The evidence is in conflict.

We are able to say that the record supports the verdict, and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought this action for attorney fees. The defendants called for a jury. They have appealed from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict.

Their single assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. No exceptions were taken to the instructions. The evidence is in conflict.

We are able to say that the record supports the verdict, and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

335 P.2d 598, 53 Wash. 2d 829, 1959 Wash. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-helmick-wash-1959.