Howe v. Gillespie

Eighth Circuit

Howe v. Gillespie

261 F. 48, 171 C.C.A. 644, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1711

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 22, 1919

DocketNo. 5343

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 261 F. 48 (Howe v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howe v. Gillespie, 261 F. 48, 171 C.C.A. 644, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1711 (8th Cir. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is another of the cases tried with Washburn v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 41,-C. C. A.-, determined at this term. The contentions are the same, except that this appellant claims that his lease was to be the same as that given by Frank Wright and involved in Frank Wright v. E. N. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46,-C. C. A. -, also decided at this term. The trial court found against this claim, and a thorough examination of the evidence reveals no substantial reason for disturbing that conclusion.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is another of the cases tried with Washburn v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 41,-C. C. A.-, determined at this term. The contentions are the same, except that this appellant claims that his lease was to be the same as that given by Frank Wright and involved in Frank Wright v. E. N. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46,-C. C. A. -, also decided at this term. The trial court found against this claim, and a thorough examination of the evidence reveals no substantial reason for disturbing that conclusion.

The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 F. 48, 171 C.C.A. 644, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-gillespie-ca8-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack