Howe v. Dixon
This text of Howe v. Dixon (Howe v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-0778 _____________________________
DANIEL P. HOWE,
Appellant,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Department of Corrections,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Frederick Laurence Koberlein, Jr., Judge.
August 2, 2024
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Daniel Patrick Howe, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General; Sheron Lee Wells and Michael Layton Schaub, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee; Dan Johnson, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Howe v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2024.