Howe v. BOUCREE

Michigan Supreme Court

Howe v. BOUCREE

762 N.W.2d 477, 483 Mich. 907

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 20, 2009·No. 136926·Published

Opinion

Leave to appeal is denied in relation to the judgment of the Court of Appeals ordering a new trial because of misconduct by the plaintiffs attorney. As stated by the panel, the resolution of this issue renders the other appellate issues moot. Accordingly, we vacate the remainder of the Court of Appeals judgment. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is denied. Court of Appeals No. 273949.

Kelly, C. J. I would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to appeal is denied in relation to the judgment of the Court of Appeals ordering a new trial because of misconduct by the plaintiffs attorney. As stated by the panel, the resolution of this issue renders the other appellate issues moot. Accordingly, we vacate the remainder of the Court of Appeals judgment. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is denied. Court of Appeals No. 273949.

Kelly, C. J. I would grant leave to appeal.

Howe v. BOUCREE, 762 N.W.2d 477, 483 Mich. 907 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

762 N.W.2d 477 (Howe v. BOUCREE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.