Howe v. BOUCREE

Michigan Supreme Court

Howe v. BOUCREE

762 N.W.2d 477, 483 Mich. 907

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 20, 2009

Docket136926

StatusPublished

This text of 762 N.W.2d 477 (Howe v. BOUCREE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howe v. BOUCREE, 762 N.W.2d 477, 483 Mich. 907 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Leave to appeal is denied in relation to the judgment of the Court of Appeals ordering a new trial because of misconduct by the plaintiffs attorney. As stated by the panel, the resolution of this issue renders the other appellate issues moot. Accordingly, we vacate the remainder of the Court of Appeals judgment. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is denied. Court of Appeals No. 273949.

Kelly, C. J. I would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leave to appeal is denied in relation to the judgment of the Court of Appeals ordering a new trial because of misconduct by the plaintiffs attorney. As stated by the panel, the resolution of this issue renders the other appellate issues moot. Accordingly, we vacate the remainder of the Court of Appeals judgment. The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants is denied. Court of Appeals No. 273949.

Kelly, C. J. I would grant leave to appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

762 N.W.2d 477, 483 Mich. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-v-boucree-mich-2009.