Howe Machine Co. v. Layman

Illinois Circuit Court

Howe Machine Co. v. Layman

2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 43

DecidedJanuary 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 43 (Howe Machine Co. v. Layman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howe Machine Co. v. Layman, 2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 43 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.:—

There is a motion by appellant for further time to file brief. In this case the court thinks there are grounds for an extension of the time. The time will be extended six days. That, however, will carry it past the call. The case will be taken when it is reached on the call, unless appellee shall object, and if the party applying fails to comply with the rule for extension of time by filing his brief, the submission will be set aside and the judgment, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.:—

There is a motion by appellant for further time to file brief. In this case the court thinks there are grounds for an extension of the time. The time will be extended six days. That, however, will carry it past the call. The case will be taken when it is reached on the call, unless appellee shall object, and if the party applying fails to comply with the rule for extension of time by filing his brief, the submission will be set aside and the judgment, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howe-machine-co-v-layman-illcirct-1878.