Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Howarth v. Teunon

Howarth v. Teunon

127 A. 338, 97 N.J. Eq. 364, 12 Stock. 364, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 541
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 19, 1925·Published

Opinion

*365 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

*366 Mr. Richard 8. Wilson, for the resjiondent. Mr. Marlin P. Devlin, for the appellant. For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskiric, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal—-None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howarth v. Teunon, 127 A. 338, 97 N.J. Eq. 364, 12 Stock. 364, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 541 (N.J. 1925).

127 A. 338 (Howarth v. Teunon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.