Howarth v. Teunon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Howarth v. Teunon

127 A. 338, 97 N.J. Eq. 364, 12 Stock. 364, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 541

DecidedJanuary 19, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A. 338 (Howarth v. Teunon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howarth v. Teunon, 127 A. 338, 97 N.J. Eq. 364, 12 Stock. 364, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 541 (N.J. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

*365 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

*366 Mr. Richard 8. Wilson, for the resjiondent. Mr. Marlin P. Devlin, for the appellant. For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskiric, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal—-None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*365 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

*366 Mr. Richard 8. Wilson, for the resjiondent. Mr. Marlin P. Devlin, for the appellant. For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskiric, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal—-None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A. 338, 97 N.J. Eq. 364, 12 Stock. 364, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howarth-v-teunon-nj-1925.