Howarth v. Bowling Alley Builders, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Howarth v. Bowling Alley Builders, Inc.

158 A.D.2d 925, 552 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1426

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 158 A.D.2d 925 (Howarth v. Bowling Alley Builders, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howarth v. Bowling Alley Builders, Inc., 158 A.D.2d 925, 552 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Supreme Court erred, however, in expanding upon the easement rights reserved in the 1966 deed. There is no support in the record for the court’s alteration of the scope and terms of that easement, and the order is modified to delete the remaining decretal paragraphs. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — declaratory judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Supreme Court erred, however, in expanding upon the easement rights reserved in the 1966 deed. There is no support in the record for the court’s alteration of the scope and terms of that easement, and the order is modified to delete the remaining decretal paragraphs. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J. — declaratory judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 A.D.2d 925, 552 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howarth-v-bowling-alley-builders-inc-nyappdiv-1990.