Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath)
This text of Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath) (Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ABDUL HOWARD, No. 81420 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, SEP O 9 2020 Respondent, EUETf..EROW?-1 CLERK S •REME COUi- and BY EPU WELLPATH, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
This pro se petition was filed on July 6, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On August 5, 2020, this court entered an order directing petitioner to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit demonstrating his inability to pay the filing fee within 30 days. Petitioner was cautioned that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this petition. To date, the petitioner has not complied with the August 5, 2020, order. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.' It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
BY:
lln light of this order, petitioner's pro se motion to voluntarily dismiss SUPREME COURT the petition is rendered moot. Of NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
co)-1947 z_o - 31 2-67 cc: Abdul Howard Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER 2 , O1-1947
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-vs-dist-ct-wellpath-nev-2020.