Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 2020·No. 81420·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ABDUL HOWARD, No. 81420 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, SEP O 9 2020 Respondent, EUETf..EROW?-1 CLERK S •REME COUiand

BY

EPU

WELLPATH, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

This pro se petition was filed on July 6, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On August 5, 2020, this court entered an order directing petitioner to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit demonstrating his inability to pay the filing fee within 30 days. Petitioner was cautioned that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this petition. To date, the petitioner has not complied with the August 5, 2020, order. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.'

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

BY:

lln light of this order, petitioner's pro se motion to voluntarily dismiss SUPREME COURT the petition is rendered moot. Of NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

co)-1947 z_o - 31 2-67

cc: Abdul Howard

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF

NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

2

, O1-1947

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath), (Neb. 2020).

Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath) (Howard Vs. Dist. Ct. (Wellpath)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.