Howard v. Zamorano
This text of 722 N.W.2d 889 (Howard v. Zamorano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bridget HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Lucia ZAMORANO, M.D., Harper Hospital, Detroit Medical Center, and University Neurological Associates, P.C., Defendants-Appellees, and
John R. Jacobs, M.D. and John Rachel, M.D., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
By order of July 19, 2005, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Woodard v. Custer (Docket Nos. 124994-5). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 31, 2006, 476 Mich. 545, 719 N.W.2d 842 (2006), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
722 N.W.2d 889, 477 Mich. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-zamorano-mich-2006.